G 117 20
Anlage I.
. Siehren TeeceAugust 23rd 1895.
My dear Count.
Sir Ashmed Barttlett I was told was going
to ask a qduestion in the House of Commons
about the execution of Stokes — and fearing
Popular excitement outside in the press rising
abut of the bald question I drew up one
which 1 intended to ask to countdèract the
eflect.
It was too long however, and the speaker
would not let me finish it. But I have spoken
to at least 60 members, and they quite under-
stand how the rash and misguided fellom met
his fate. The general opinion is that he
deserved it, though people would have
Preferred to hear that some other punishment
had been given him.
ours faithfully
(s.) Henry M. Stanley.
To
Mons. le Comte Borchgrave etc. etc.
Question.
May I1 ask the Rti Honourable Gentleman
before he replies to the question whether he
is aware that this Stokes said to have been
executed by Major Lothaire is the well known
Charlie Stokes who since 1879 has been a
trader in East Central Africa, that he was a
Protestant Irishman from the North of
Ireland, that he first went out to Africa as a
missionary in the service of the Church
Missionary Soeiety, that he afkfterwards
distinguished himself by his trading enter-
Pbrise and vast influence he exereised among
the natives, that he was the man established
Uwanga on the thronc of Uganda, and that
despite friendly advice and warning he
slipped between the British and German
Protectorates into the Congo State, and there
contrary to the acts and regulations of the
Brussels Conference proceeded to dispose of
arms and ammunition to the notorious slave
raider Kibonge and while vending these arms
he was arrested with Kibonge, and after trial-
by court martial was cxeeutell.
Anlage II.
2. Richmond Terracc,
Whitechall, S. W.
Sire,
I write this letter to Fou
cover to Comt Van der Steen7).
August 29th 1895.
direct under
*) Privatsekretär des Königs.
I havc seen Sir Clement Hill of the
Foreign Office and I gathered from him about
as friendly a view of the Stokes affair as you
could wish. But outside of the officials and
Parliament there is great dissatisfaction, and
the trouble appears to be growing. One
newspaper after another is joining in the line
and ery, Radicals as well as Unionists, and
unless Lothaire has a strong case, 1 fear
things will become decidedl) unpleasant. If
the courtmartial found Stokes guilty of
violence besides trading in arms and
munitions with Kibonge, and others à
majority of the people here will rest satisfied
that Stokes received only his deserts, but
unless it can be proved that he did something
more than merely trade, 1 fear that the Congo
State will have to pay handsomely) to the
family of Stokes, besides suffer humiliation.
Dr. Michaux's evidence of the last scenes is
to be specially dreaded. He has in his power
to blow the now scumming indignation into
a flame. I hope he will not be so unpatriotic
as to drawm more evils on Belgium and the
Congo State bPF intensifying this affair which
he can ensily do. There is no doubt that the
Dr. Michaux has some other animus against
Lothaire than horror at the poor man's fate,
but this is not the time to revenge himself. I
feel myself that the Major has committed a
great error of jdudgment but it would be unjust
to visit upon him an excess of anger for what
after all was only an excess of zeal. Having
seen what he must have seen on the way to
the Albert Edward region there is a great
deal to be said for his passionate hate and
hasty action, but l sincerely hope that the
finding of the courtmartial will be such as to
cg#eulpate Major Lothaire from the charge of
murder which the Radical journalists over
here are endeavoring to fix upon him. On
the side of Stokes also there is much to be
said. He was a rash, barebrained fellow, but
Was not without his good qualities. When a
man dies, his bad qualities are forgotten, and
only the gocd that he did is remembered.
The tendeney is therefore to make Stokes a
kind of martyr to trade, and if this feeling
increases in this country neither the State nor
Lothaire ean escape serious consequences.
Thenee I hope that Lothaire and his
officers have some substantial charges to
justify them in visiting upon a British sub-
ject the extreme penalty.
Meantime if Sire — Fou are not certain
that Lothaire can be esonerated from the
more serious charge — I think — that if vou